Sustainability as a Service
Providing data and process insights are needed to integrate sustainability considerations into decisions. Sustainability needs clear direction and guardrails from the top down, but at the same time must be activated from the bottom up throughout the organization. Employees need decision-making power to act where it matters. To embed sustainability, it is essential to encourage people throughout the organization to integrate sustainability into their daily tasks and decisions. Therefore, it is obvious that organizations should start feeding the analyses back into business applications. This is also true for the other parties in the ecosystem with whom they are collaborating. In addition to direct interaction with manufacturers, transporters, customers and other parties in relation to current conditions and sustainability goals, data also represents business value for analyses within other organizations. Data and analyses will increasingly be exchanged. Data as a Service, in other words, for other stakeholders in the ecosystem.
Data exchange in the form of Sustainability as a Service for obtaining sustainability insights, unlike for transactions between ecosystem partners, will prove strategic, whether for a fee or not. In any case with a view to Scope-2 and 3, and not least to promote cost efficiency in our society as a whole. The business applications of totally different players in the ecosystem also benefit from better sustainability data, so that integral improvements in sustainability can be realized there too.
From insight to outlook
Artificial intelligence (AI) has all the attention right now. It is now perceived as special and sometimes even threatening. But in the long run, AI, like the Internet today, is common good. The disruptive nature of the Internet on business and society in the past will be no different with respect to AI. A characteristic of disruptive techniques and practices is that they require new knowledge and skills for those who wish to apply them.
Safely mining numerous data sources, cost-effectively setting up and operating a data warehouse and developing models based on AI require a pretty steep learning curve from established organizations.
So what path should you take when using AI on your business data and decision-making? On the one hand, the ambition of one's own organization is important to achieve highly effective business solutions to complex issues. Such as solutions that go beyond what we can achieve with classical analytics within a given time frame. On the other hand, the pace of developments in the market is a driving force in applying AI techniques within the ecosystem. By contrasting these two fundamentals, roughly four possibilities emerge:
- Transaction-driven data exchange without analytical capability (little ambition, few market requirements)
- Connecting own applications with AI models of others by using their domain knowledge (little ambition, many market requirements)
- Developing own simple AI models on a project basis (high ambition, low market requirements)
- Deliver AI powered services based on own domain knowledge and corporate intellectual property (high ambition, high market requirements)
Step 4 will not prove to be a requirement for every enterprise. Nor does the same path need to be followed for every insight question. A hybrid approach is obvious. The question for now, however, is for which type of organization and activities it is crucial to be able to survive over time without the need for applied AI models to belong to one's own intellectual property. The moment the need for use of AI materializes, the race is on. At the root of all this is data, as a valuable asset, which must be the first thing to get right at minimal cost.
Every man for himself?
Should each company then build its own intelligent "sustainability stack"? After all, market forces are a great thing, and intellectual property within analytical models should be able to be developed in confidentiality. Also in terms of waste reduction, energy transitions and sustainability in general. But where it comes to generically available multi-tenant cloud-based solutions, where data and analytical models can be kept confidential, there is no need for everyone to reinvent the wheel for themselves.
There is also the permanently exponentially growing sea of data. How long do organizations want to continue bringing in data that is also stored elsewhere? How many parties in an ecosystem think so cost-effectively, and sustainably, to store their data in a cloud environment? How often will data be replicated in the cloud over time, purely because each organization wants the security of fast and reliable data access for itself?
Data hunger will accelerate with the rise of artificial intelligence and training Machine Learning models. Fortunately, technology is increasingly enabling us to securely and quickly access external data sources, allowing the classic Extract & Transform principle to increasingly take place "on demand" and limiting replication of data sources with the deployment of good "Data as a Service agreements" between parties in the ecosystem.
Confidentiality plays a crucial role here. The need for central control over datasets and analysis results is therefore growing, with issues such as rights structures, pseudonymization and pricing being managed.