As you have read in the first article, we judge data quality by the extent to which data meets the expectations of stakeholders, or users. However, many organizations fail in defining what makes data fit for purpose (DAMA International, 2017). This data user side is essential to making informed choices and conscious financial investments in data management. Indeed, decisions and investments to improve data quality must contribute to the user side's goal of creating more value. Organizing conversations between user, manager and data owner contributes to the awareness of these parties and the reasonability of certain quality requirements. Balancing everyone's interests in combination with laws and regulations is what data quality governance embraces.
By the way, the solution does not always lie in choices or investments in more quality rules or more systems. Often there is an underlying cause why the current data quality is not in order. It is wise to investigate this first, although this is not always possible. The choice between short-term action or investigating the underlying cause first must be made by the owner and end user, and is different for each use case.
We ended the first article with a quality check you can perform on your critical data. By comparing the results of this check with the intended quality, you can identify any deviations. In addition to the technical script, deviations can also be identified by getting in touch with different employees in the organization and asking what they are up against when using certain data. In this way, you can arrive at points of improvement that will help you achieve the intended data quality.